|
Professor Rutgers School of Law - Camden 217 North Fifth Street Camden, NJ 08102
F: (856) 225-6516
|
Biography
Michael Carrier teaches and writes in the areas of antitrust, intellectual property, and property law. His work has appeared or is forthcoming in the Stanford Law Review, Michigan Law Review, University of Pennsylvania Law Review, Duke Law Journal, Vanderbilt Law Review, Minnesota Law Review, Iowa Law Review, and Yale Law Journal Pocket Part. His book, "Innovation for the 21st Century: Harnessing the Power of Intellectual Property and Antitrust Law," will be published by Oxford University Press in 2009.
Professor Carrier is a summa cum laude graduate of Yale University and a cum laude graduate of Michigan Law School, where he was Book Review Editor of the law review. For four years, he litigated antitrust, civil, intellectual property, and sports cases at Covington & Burling, in Washington, D.C. He also clerked for the Honorable John D. Butzner, Jr. on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.
Publications
Innovation for the 21st Century: Harnessing the Power of Intellectual Property and Antitrust Law, Oxford University Press (forthcoming 2009), available for purchase here.
* Philadelphia Inquirer discussion of the book available here
* Blog symposium on the book available here
Critical Concepts in Intellectual Property Law: Competition, Edward Elgar Publishing (editor, forthcoming 2009)
Unsettling Drug Patent Settlements: A Framework for Presumptive Illegality, 108 Michigan Law Review __ (forthcoming 2009),
available here.
The Rule of Reason in the 21st Century, 17 George Mason Law Review __ (forthcoming 2009) (symposium)
Two Puzzles Resolved: Of the Schumpeter-Arrow Stalemate and Pharmaceutical Innovation Markets, 93 Iowa Law Review 393 (2008), available here.
Why Modularity Does Not (and Should Not) Explain Intellectual Property, 116 Yale Law Journal Pocket Part 95 (2007) (solicited), available here.
Against Cyberproperty, 22 Berkeley Technology Law Journal 1485 (2007) (with Greg Lastowka), available here.
Pictures at the New Economy Exhibition: Why the Antitrust Modernization Commission Got it (Mostly) Right, 38 Rutgers Law Journal 473 (2007) (symposium), available here.
The Propertization of Copyright, chapter in Intellectual Property and Information Wealth (Praeger, 2006)
Of Trinko, Tea Leaves, and Intellectual Property, 31 Journal of Corporation Law 357 (2006) (symposium), available here.
Refusals to License Intellectual Property After Trinko, 55 DePaul Law Review 1191 (2006) (symposium), available here.
Vote Counting, Technology, and Unintended Consequences, 79 St. John's Law Review 645 (2005), available here.
Does a Patent Automatically Demonstrate Market Power for Purposes of the Antitrust Tying Offense?, American Bar Association series, Preview of U.S. Supreme Court Cases (2005)
The Recess Appointments Clause, entry in The Heritage Guide to the Constitution (2005) (solicited)
Review of IP and Antitrust (Hovenkamp, Janis & Lemley eds.), 28 World Competition Law and Economics Review 277 (2005) (solicited)
Cabining Intellectual Property Through a Property Paradigm, 54 Duke Law Journal 1 (2004), available here.
Resolving the Patent-Antitrust Paradox Through Tripartite Innovation, 56 Vanderbilt Law Review 1047 (2003), available here.
Why Antitrust Should Defer to the Intellectual Property Rules of Standard Setting Organizations: A Commentary on Teece & Sherry, 87 Minnesota Law Review 2019 (2003), available here.
Antitrust After the Interception: Of a Heroic Returner and Myriad Paths, 55 Stanford Law Review 287 (2002) [Review of Richard Posner, Antitrust Law (2d ed. 2001)], available here.
* Also published in The Antitrust Source (March 2002) (solicited), available here.
Unraveling the Patent-Antitrust Paradox, 150 University of Pennsylvania Law Review 761 (2002), available here.
The Real Rule of Reason: Bridging the Disconnect, 1999 Brigham Young University Law Review 1265 (1999), available here.
All Aboard the Congressional Fast Track: From Trade to Beyond, 29 George Washington Journal of International Law & Economics 687 (1996)
Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes: Law and the Inner Self, 93 Michigan Law Review 1894 (1995)
When Is the Senate in Recess for Purposes of the Recess Appointments Clause?, 92 Michigan Law Review 2204 (1994), available here.